Our principles

How we handle sources and language

Every explanation is drawn from public policy documents and standard plan contracts. Where a term has several meanings across insurers or states, we say so and define the version an article uses. We avoid steering language and do not rank plans as a single answer for everyone.

Our separation is strict: educational analysis stays editorial, and no article is written to promote a private policy sale. When a question depends on an individual's circumstances, we point readers toward the documents and questions to bring to a qualified advisor.

Our review method

Each article is checked before publication

01

Trace the source

Each claim is matched to a public policy document, plan summary, or standard contract language before drafting begins.

02

Define the terms

Jargon is explained in plain English at first use, with the definition we rely on stated clearly.

03

Review for steering

Drafts are read for neutral wording, avoiding guarantees, fear-based warnings, and claims that one plan suits everyone.

04

Correct and date

When rules or documents change, we revise the article and note the update so readers can see what has changed.